On July 21, 2025, a new scientific article on biological fullerenes, prepared by Dr. Ewa Kłodzińska , was published . The publication addresses the key differences between synthetic and biological fullerenes, highlighting their safety and applications. A special place in the text is occupied by AURONN®, the only biological fullerene tested by the Polish Academy of Sciences.
The article "Fullerenes: Biological Revolution vs. Synthetic Precision" explores the growing importance of carbon nanostructures in medicine and cosmetology. The authors explain that synthetic C₆₀ is characterized by high purity but may carry a risk of toxicity and does not have nutritional status in the EU. Biological fullerenes—including AURONN®—are naturally produced in biotechnological processes, demonstrate high biocompatibility, and comply with FDA, EFSA, and GIS regulations. The publication highlights their strong antioxidant potential and possible applications, including in cosmetology and oxidative stress research .
This article describes the differences between synthetic and biological fullerenes, pointing out that AURONN®, as a natural form of carbon, has a better safety profile and high antioxidant potential. The publication suggests that biological fullerenes may represent a promising alternative to traditional antioxidants in modern cosmetic and biomedical products .
Link to article:
Fullerenes. Biological revolution vs. synthetic precision. Who will win the nanotechnology race?
